Era of Agents: what about the Spotify model? Yes, maybe, who knows
The third way to monetize agent skills is microtransactions: the agent platform pays you whenever your skill gets used. It benefits the user, the creator and the platform — once the platforms decide to share their profits.
Key takeaways
- Microtransactions are the third way to monetize an agent skill, after subscriptions and ads — and the only one that was not possible before.
- You get paid by the agent platform each time your skill is called, rather than by each user signing up.
- Nobody can manage thousands of subscriptions, so the agent gets an allowance and spends it on demand.
- The closest existing analogy is Spotify: the platform charges users directly and shares the revenue with whoever created the content.
- The remaining gap is infrastructure — platform providers have to decide to share their profits first.
Transcript
In the era of agents, most consumer apps will become skills. And the ways to monetize them are subscriptions — we already discussed that — and ads, which are a bit tricky and risky with LLMs, and we discussed that as well.
The third way is the most exciting one, and I really believe it’s something new that was not possible previously. It’s micropayments: you get paid whenever an agent decides to use your skill.
In one of the previous videos I discussed this idea of micropayments, and it got enabled recently. First of all by blockchain — instantaneous transactions, and nearly zero cost transactions. Second, by the recent advancement in LLMs and agents and delegation. It just requires this kind of on-demand microtransactions.
You cannot manage thousands of subscriptions. It’s a pain. Sometimes you need to make this call, sometimes you need to make this task — it’s just not scalable. You cannot manage it anymore. You have to keep it flexible, relax it a bit. So your agent will have an allowance, and it will keep using that allowance.
But moreover — we discussed that the agent is becoming the execution layer, the execution environment for your skills, for your apps. And as a result, whoever runs the agent, the platform, is very likely to pay you. They will charge the users directly, and they’re likely to pay you part of that transaction, to share this profit with you whenever your skill is being called, is being used.
I believe this is something new. That’s probably closer to the Spotify model: they charge the users directly, but then the artist who created the content gets some part of that profit. So with skills, we get this model working for software as well. That’s what software will become in the future.
Sources and further reading
- The x402 protocol introduction describes HTTP-native, machine-to-machine payments for APIs and autonomous agents — the transport layer this model would need.
Comments